Diffusion-weighted imaging as predictor of acute ischemic stroke etiology / Imágenes por difusión cerebral como predictor de la etiología del accidente cerebrovascular isquémico agudo

Abstract Background: Topographic patterns may correlate with causes of ischemic stroke. Objective: To investigate the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification. Methods: We included 1019 ischemic stroke patients. DWI were classified as: i) negative; ii) DWI single lesion (cortico-subcortical, cortical, subcortical ≥20 mm, or subcortical <20 mm); iii) scattered lesions in one territory (small scattered lesions or confluent with additional lesions); and iv) multiple lesions (multiple unilateral anterior circulation [MAC], multiple posterior circulation [MPC], multiple bilateral anterior circulation [MBAC], and multiple anterior and posterior circulations [MAP]). Results: There was a relationship between DWI patterns and TOAST classification (p<0.001). Large artery atherosclerosis was associated with small, scattered lesions in one vascular territory (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.61-6.8), MPC (OR 3.52; 95%CI 1.54-8.03), and subcortical lesions <20 mm (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.76-6.85). Cardioembolic strokes correlated with MAP (OR 4.3; 95%CI 1.64-11.2), cortico-subcortical lesions (OR 3.24; 95%CI 1.9-5.5) and negative DWI (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.1-5.49). Cryptogenic strokes correlated with negative DWI (OR 4.1; 95%CI 1,84-8.69), cortical strokes (OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.25-8.8), MAP (OR 3.33; 95%CI 1.25-8.81) and subcortical lesion ≥20 mm (OR 2.44; 95%CI 1,04-5.73). Lacunar strokes correlated with subcortical lesions diameter <20 mm (OR 42.9; 95%CI 22.7-81.1) and negative DWI (OR 8.87; 95%CI 4.03-19.5). Finally, MBAC (OR 9.25; 95%CI 1.12-76.2), MAP (OR 5.54; 95%CI 1.94-15.1), and MPC (OR 3.61; 95%CI 1.5-8.7) correlated with stroke of other etiologies. Conclusions: A relationship exists between DWI and stroke subtype.

RESUMEN Antecedentes: Los patrones topográficos pueden correlacionarse con las causas del accidente cerebrovascular isquémico. Objetivo: Investigar la asociación entre imágenes ponderadas por difusión por resonancia nuclear magnética (dRNM) y el ensayo de Org 10172 en la clasificación de tratamiento agudo de accidentes cerebrovasculares (TOAST). Métodos: Fueron incluidos 1.019 pacientes con accidente cerebrovascular isquémico. Las dRNM fueron clasificadas como: i) negativa; ii) dRNM lesión única (cortico-subcortical, cortical, subcortical ≥20 mm, o subcortical <20 mm); iii) lesiones disgregadas un territorio vascular (pequeñas lesiones dispersas o confluentes con lesiones adicionales); y iv) lesiones múltiples (unilaterales de circulación anterior [MAC], de circulación posterior [MPC], bilaterales de circulación anterior [MBAC] y de circulación anterior y posterior [MAP]). Resultados: Existió relación entre los patrones de dRNM y la clasificación TOAST (p<0,001). La aterosclerosis de las arterias grandes se asoció con lesiones pequeñas y disgregadas en un territorio vascular (Odds Ratio [OR] 4,22, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%] 2,61-6,8), MPC (OR 3,52; IC95% 1,54-8,03), y lesiones subcorticales <20 mm (OR 3,47; IC95% 1,76-6,85). Cardioembolias se relacionaron con MAP (OR 4,3; IC95% 1,64-11,2), lesiones cortico-subcorticales (OR 3,24; IC95% 1,9-5,5) y dRNM negativas (OR 2,46; IC95% 1,1-5,49). Los accidentes cerebrovasculares criptogénicos se relacionaron con dRNM negativas (OR 4,1; IC95% 1,84-8,69), accidentes cerebrovasculares corticales (OR 3,3; IC95% 1,25-8,8), MAP (OR 3,33; IC95% 1,25-8,81) y lesiones subcorticales ≥20 mm (OR 2,44; IC95% 1,04-5,73). Los accidentes cerebrovasculares lacunares se correlacionaron con lesiones subcorticales de diámetro <20 mm (OR 42,9; IC95% 22,7-81,1) y dRNM negativas (OR 8,87; IC95% 4,03-19,5). Finalmente, MBAC (OR 9,25; IC95% 1,12-76,2), MAP (OR 5,54; IC95% 1,94-15,1) y MPC (OR 3,61; IC95% 1,5-8,7) se relacionaron con accidentes cerebrovasculares de otras etiologías. Conclusiones: Existe relación entre dRNM y subtipo de accidente cerebrovascular.

Diffusion-weighted imaging as predictor of acute ischemic stroke etiology.

BACKGROUND: Topographic patterns may correlate with causes of ischemic stroke. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification. METHODS: We included 1019 ischemic stroke patients. DWI were classified as: i) negative; ii) DWI single lesion (cortico-subcortical, cortical, subcortical ≥20 mm, or subcortical <20 mm); iii) scattered lesions in one territory (small scattered lesions or confluent with additional lesions); and iv) multiple lesions (multiple unilateral anterior circulation [MAC], multiple posterior circulation [MPC], multiple bilateral anterior circulation [MBAC], and multiple anterior and posterior circulations [MAP]). RESULTS: There was a relationship between DWI patterns and TOAST classification (p<0.001). Large artery atherosclerosis was associated with small, scattered lesions in one vascular territory (Odds Ratio [OR] 4.22, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 2.61-6.8), MPC (OR 3.52; 95%CI 1.54-8.03), and subcortical lesions <20 mm (OR 3.47; 95%CI 1.76-6.85). Cardioembolic strokes correlated with MAP (OR 4.3; 95%CI 1.64-11.2), cortico-subcortical lesions (OR 3.24; 95%CI 1.9-5.5) and negative DWI (OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.1-5.49). Cryptogenic strokes correlated with negative DWI (OR 4.1; 95%CI 1,84-8.69), cortical strokes (OR 3.3; 95%CI 1.25-8.8), MAP (OR 3.33; 95%CI 1.25-8.81) and subcortical lesion ≥20 mm (OR 2.44; 95%CI 1,04-5.73). Lacunar strokes correlated with subcortical lesions diameter <20 mm (OR 42.9; 95%CI 22.7-81.1) and negative DWI (OR 8.87; 95%CI 4.03-19.5). Finally, MBAC (OR 9.25; 95%CI 1.12-76.2), MAP (OR 5.54; 95%CI 1.94-15.1), and MPC (OR 3.61; 95%CI 1.5-8.7) correlated with stroke of other etiologies. CONCLUSIONS: A relationship exists between DWI and stroke subtype.

Low dosis of alteplase, for ischemic stroke after Enchanted and its determinants, a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Low-dose alteplase (LrtPA) has been shown not to be inferior to the standard-dose (SrtPA) with respect to death/disability. OBJECTIVE: We aim to evaluate the percentage of patients treated with LrtPA at our center after the ENCHANTED trial and the factors associated with the use of this dosage. METHODS: Prospective study in consecutive patients with an acute stroke admitted between June 2016 and November 2018. RESULTS: 160 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 50% female; mean age 65.4±18.5 years. Of these, 48 patients (30%) received LrtPA. In univariate analysis, LrtPA was associated with patient's age (p=0.000), previous modified Rankin scale scores (mRS) (p<0.000), hypertension (p=0.076), diabetes mellitus (p=0.021), hypercholesterolemia (p=0.19), smoking (p=0.06), atrial fibrillation (p=0.10), history of coronary artery disease (p=0.06), previous treatment with antiplatelet agents (p<0.000), admission International Normalized Ratio-INR (p=0.18), platelet count (p=0.045), leukoaraiosis on neuroimaging (p<0.003), contraindications for thrombolytic treatment (p=0.000) and endovascular treatment (p=0.027). Previous relevant bleedings were determinants for treatment with LrtPA. Final diagnosis on discharge of stroke mimic was significant (p=0.02) for treatment with SrtPA. In multivariate analysis, mRS (OR: 2.21; 95%CI 1.37‒14.19), previous antiplatelet therapy (OR: 11.41; 95%CI 3.98‒32.70), contraindications for thrombolysis (OR: 56.10; 95%CI 8.81‒357.80), leukoaraiosis (OR: 4.41; 95%CI 1.37‒14.10) and diagnosis of SM (OR: 0.22; 95%CI 0.10‒0.40) remained independently associated. CONCLUSIONS: Following the ENCHANTED trial, LrtPA was restricted to 30% of our patients. The criteria that clinicians apply are based mostly on clinical variables that may increase the risk of brain or systemic hemorrhage or exclude the patient from treatment with lytic drugs.

Low dosis of alteplase, for ischemic stroke after Enchanted and its determinants, a single center experience / Dosis reducida de alteplase en el accidente cerebrovascular isquémico después del estudio Enchanted y sus determinantes, una experiencia de un solo centro

Abstract Background: Low-dose alteplase (LrtPA) has been shown not to be inferior to the standard-dose (SrtPA) with respect to death/disability. Objective: We aim to evaluate the percentage of patients treated with LrtPA at our center after the ENCHANTED trial and the factors associated with the use of this dosage. Methods: Prospective study in consecutive patients with an acute stroke admitted between June 2016 and November 2018. Results: 160 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis, 50% female; mean age 65.4±18.5 years. Of these, 48 patients (30%) received LrtPA. In univariate analysis, LrtPA was associated with patient's age (p=0.000), previous modified Rankin scale scores (mRS) (p<0.000), hypertension (p=0.076), diabetes mellitus (p=0.021), hypercholesterolemia (p=0.19), smoking (p=0.06), atrial fibrillation (p=0.10), history of coronary artery disease (p=0.06), previous treatment with antiplatelet agents (p<0.000), admission International Normalized Ratio-INR (p=0.18), platelet count (p=0.045), leukoaraiosis on neuroimaging (p<0.003), contraindications for thrombolytic treatment (p=0.000) and endovascular treatment (p=0.027). Previous relevant bleedings were determinants for treatment with LrtPA. Final diagnosis on discharge of stroke mimic was significant (p=0.02) for treatment with SrtPA. In multivariate analysis, mRS (OR: 2.21; 95%CI 1.37‒14.19), previous antiplatelet therapy (OR: 11.41; 95%CI 3.98‒32.70), contraindications for thrombolysis (OR: 56.10; 95%CI 8.81‒357.80), leukoaraiosis (OR: 4.41; 95%CI 1.37‒14.10) and diagnosis of SM (OR: 0.22; 95%CI 0.10‒0.40) remained independently associated. Conclusions: Following the ENCHANTED trial, LrtPA was restricted to 30% of our patients. The criteria that clinicians apply are based mostly on clinical variables that may increase the risk of brain or systemic hemorrhage or exclude the patient from treatment with lytic drugs.

RESUMEN Introducción: Dosis reducidas de trombolitico (LrtPA) podrían no ser inferiores en muerte/discapacidad. Objetivo: Evaluar el porcentaje de pacientes tratados con LrtPA en nuestro centro después del ensayo ENCHANTED, y los factores asociados con el uso de esta dosis. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de pacientes consecutivos con infarto cerebral ingresados ​entre junio de 2016 y noviembre de 2018. Resultados: 160 pacientes fueron tratados con trombólisis intravenosa, 50% mujeres; edad media 65,4±18,5 años. 48 casos (30%) recibieron LrtPA. En el análisis univariado, LrtPA se asoció con la edad del paciente (p=0,000), escala de Rankin modificadas (mRS) (p<0,000), hipertensión arterial (p=0,076), diabetes mellitus (p=0,021), hipercolesterolemia (p=0,19), tabaquismo (p=0,06), fibrilación auricular (p=0,10), antecedentes de enfermedad coronaria (p=0,06), tratamiento previo con antiplaquetarios (p<0,000), International Normalized Ratio-INR (p=0,18), recuento de plaquetario (p=0,045), leucoaraiosis en neuroimagen (p<0,003), contraindicaciones para el tratamiento trombolítico (p=0,000) y tratamiento endovascular (p=0,027). Las hemorragias previas relevantes fueron determinantes para el tratamiento con LrtPA. El diagnóstico al alta de imitador de accidente cerebrovascular fue significativo (p=0,02) para el tratamiento con dosis estándar. El análisis multivariado demostró que mRS (OR: 2,21; IC95% 1,37‒14,19), tratamiento antiplaquetario previo (OR: 11,41; IC95% 3,98‒32,7), contraindicaciones para trombólisis (OR: 56,1; IC95% 8,81‒357,8), leucoaraiosis (OR: 4,41; IC95% 1,37‒14,1) y un diagnóstico de imitador de accidente cerebrovascular (OR: 0,22; IC95% 0,1‒0,40) fueron asociados con la dosis recibida. Conclusiones: LrtPA está restringido al 30% de nuestros pacientes. Los criterios para tomar esta decisión se basan en variables que podrían aumentar el riesgo de hemorragia cerebral/sistémica o excluir al paciente del tratamiento con fármacos líticos.